![]() ![]() Well, neither Calc nor Writer do the labor. “Why can’t Calc do something, Writer easily can?” The mentioned bug, however, never was assigned or marked “RESOLVED”. The actual (7.4.1) behavior is even worse in a detail: The young REGEX() function doesn’t replace with \n, but with n, and by that cover the tracks. ![]() ![]() A very old one concerning RegEx in Calc and also the special control \n is tdf# 43107. There are bug reports and enhancement requests concerning the field (some reported by myself). In addition there were case where I “researched” into the details, and had to accept that some were changed later without notice. Unfortunartely it’s much more complicated, and there are many details I also don’t know. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |